A FIPSE-Funded National Initiative

Integrating Civil Discourse into the Curriculum

ICDC introduces a fundamentally new model for strengthening civil discourse in higher education by treating sound reasoning and civil dialogue not as separate pedagogical goals, but as interdependent cognitive skills that must be taught together.

With support from FIPSE, we will implement this integrated approach on 125 campuses—including R1 universities, HBCUs, community colleges, and civic institutes—reaching tens of thousands of students and training 375 faculty members to reform General Education Requirements nationwide.

Why Civil Discourse Matters

In recent years, a rise in protest tactics has disrupted dialogue on U.S. college campuses. Controversial topics are discussed in an atmosphere of perceived—or real—violence. Traditional responses have fallen short of addressing the root causes.

The Critical Thinking Gap

Nearly half of U.S. college graduates lack proficiency in critical thinking. This persistent deficit particularly affects first-generation, low-income, and underrepresented students who often lack the confidence to evaluate arguments constructively.

The Dialogue Disconnect

Most discourse programs focus on encouraging students to talk across differences, but they rarely ensure students have the analytical tools needed to generate well-reasoned claims before entering conversation.

The Missing Link

Critical-thinking curricula teach logic and argument analysis in isolation, without structured opportunities to practice applying those skills in live dialogue with those who hold opposing views.

Epistemic Humility

Students encounter polarized discourse and algorithmic echo chambers. Many learn to defend inherited views rather than evaluate evidence impartially, eroding their openness to revision and capacity for intellectual collaboration.

The root causes of polarization are not just incivility, but the widespread inability to distinguish sound from unsound reasoning and to revise one's views in light of evidence. ICDC addresses both.

Our Integrated Approach

ICDC's innovation is to link rigorous argument analysis and guided civil dialogue through validated pedagogies and AI-assisted tools, enabling students to form better arguments and then test those arguments responsibly in structured conversations.

Developing Intellectual Character

Civil discourse instruction is most successful when clearly focused on forming the student's habits of mind. Our central objective is to cultivate two intellectual virtues: the confidence to think for oneself, and epistemic humility about what one knows and does not know. We do not aim to provide students with more information—we aim to develop their character.

Project Goals

1

Scale Student Reach

Enroll 95,064 students in the experiment, with 71,298 receiving intensive, targeted civil discourse education.

2

Train Faculty

Train 375 faculty members to integrate civil discourse instruction into the curriculum across three summer workshops.

3

Rigorous Research

Conduct a quasi-randomized controlled three-year longitudinal study testing the effectiveness of AI civil discourse tools.

4

Model Programs

Create a model program in civil discourse reform on 125 college campuses across all sectors of higher education.

5

National Replication

Produce a handbook and online hub to guide replication at institutions nationwide, including HBCUs and community colleges.

125
Campus Partners
95K+
Students Reached
375
Faculty Trained
4
Year Initiative

AI-Assisted Learning Tools

To speak in a civil way one must know how to reason in a fair way. ICDC leverages two innovative, proven platforms that together provide instruction in argument analysis and real-time practice in civil dialogue.

thinkARGUMENTS

Mastery Learning + Argument Mapping

An online asynchronous course centered on argument mapping—a research-backed framework for teaching students to analyze, visualize, and evaluate arguments with clarity, rigor, and intellectual humility.

  • Guides students through 35+ reasoning skills
  • Automatic feedback until mastery is demonstrated
  • Proven 10-22% improvement in critical thinking
  • Used at 70+ colleges with 40,000+ users
  • 93% faculty retention rate

Sway

AI-Guided Civil Discourse Practice

A civil discourse practice community—an AI-supported platform proven to teach respectful dialogue about controversial issues by pairing students who disagree and facilitating their conversations in real time.

  • Pairs students with opposing viewpoints
  • AI agent guides, prompts, and de-escalates
  • Won the 2024 Tools Competition (Post-Secondary)
  • 80+ colleges, 8,000+ students
  • 90% feel comfortable sharing sincere views

thinkARGUMENTS + Sway

The Complete Civil Discourse Pedagogy

Together, these tools provide the foundation for ICDC's integrated approach: thinkARGUMENTS provides the instruction; Sway provides the lab. Students learn to decompose arguments, identify assumptions, and generate counterarguments—then practice applying those skills in real-time debates with peers who hold opposing views.

A new feature, ChatMaps, will create a real-time argument visualization bridge between thinkARGUMENTS's asynchronous instruction and Sway's synchronous dialogue practice.

Our Partners

ICDC brings together Civic Institutes, leading universities, and proven nonprofits to create a national coalition capable of teaching civil discourse at scale and reforming General Education Requirements.

Civic Institute Partner

School of Civic Life and Leadership (SCiLL)

University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill

Nationally known for its comprehensive, university-wide initiative to rebuild civic literacy through integrated coursework, faculty development, and public programming.

John Rose, Ph.D.; Simon Cullen, Ph.D.

University Partners

University of Notre Dame

Lead Institution

Primary fiscal agent and grantee. Large private university with established civil discourse programs.

Paul Blaschko, Co-PI

North Carolina State University

Project Direction & Research

Land-Grant university leading the National Critical Thinking Initiative and thinkPACK program.

Gary Comstock, Co-PI & Director; Daniel Gruehn, Data Analyst

University of Texas-Austin

School of Civic Leadership

Large flagship university with established civic leadership programs.

Reid Comstock, Assistant Professor

Harvard University

Philosophy Faculty Partner

Elite private university contributing philosophical expertise to the initiative.

Ned Hall, Professor of Philosophy

Edward Waters University

HBCU Partner

Historically Black university ensuring representation and reach to underserved communities.

Todd DeRose, Assistant Professor

Camden County College

Community College Partner

Two-year institution ensuring the model works across all sectors of higher education.

David Slakter, Assistant Professor

Nonprofit Partners

ThinkerAnalytix

Critical Thinking Curriculum

Develops and maintains thinkARGUMENTS, providing scalable instruction in argument mapping and critical thinking.

Aidan Kestigian; Anne L'Hommedieu Sanderson

Disagree Wisely

Civil Discourse Platform

Provides and supports Sway, the AI-assisted platform for practicing civil dialogue across disagreement.

Simon Cullen, Co-Founder & CEO; Nicholas DiBella, Co-Founder & CTOO

Heterodox Academy

Network & Support

Provides broader network support and helps promote viewpoint diversity in higher education.

Michael Regnier, Executive Director

Longitudinal Study Design

ICDC will conduct a large, three-year longitudinal study measuring the effectiveness of training faculty to integrate civil discourse and critical thinking into required courses at scale.

Participant Structure

Teams of three faculty "Civil Discourse Fellows" from each of 125 institutions will participate in summer workshops, then implement the program reaching 34 students per treatment group, per Fellow, per year.

Quasi-Randomized Design

Four treatment groups enable rigorous comparison: Control, Sway-only, thinkARGUMENTS-only, and thinkARGUMENTS + Sway combined. Staggered rollout enables difference-in-differences analysis.

Outcome Measures

Primary outcomes include CRIT (Critical Reasoning and Inference Test) scores, thinkARGUMENTS mastery checks, and Sway dialogue analysis measuring clarity, accuracy, and belief-updating.

Three-Year Tracking

Students complete CRIT at entry, end of semester, and graduation—enabling measurement of long-term retention and transfer of civil discourse skills beyond the intervention period.

Study Groups

Group A

Control
(No intervention)

Group B

Sway Only
(Dialogue practice)

Group C

thinkARGUMENTS Only
(Reasoning instruction)

Group D

TA + Sway
(Integrated approach)

Project Timeline

Y1

Planning & Development

January - December 2026

Initial planning, workshop design, Call for Applications, and development of the Foundations of American Democracy (FAD) course customization for thinkARGUMENTS.

Y2

Workshop 1 at UNC-Chapel Hill

January - December 2027

First summer workshop at SCiLL with ~100 Fellows (33 campus teams). Cohort 1 begins implementation, enrolling first students in the study.

Y3

Workshop 2 at Civic Institute TBD

January - December 2028

Second workshop with ~125 Fellows (42 campus teams). Cohorts 1 and 2 implementing. Data analysis begins.

Y4

Workshop 3 & Synthesis

January - December 2029

Final workshop with ~150 Fellows (50 campus teams). All cohorts active. Final data collection, analysis, publications, and dissemination of handbook and online hub.

Expected Impact

The magnitude of outcomes likely to be attained by this effort is unprecedented. ICDC is on track to become the largest study of its kind.

Immediate Reach

Over 4 years, ICDC will engage more than 70,000 students in civic discourse structured and led by 375 faculty members at 125 institutions across all sectors of higher education.

Long-Term Scale

A conservative estimate of students reached over the next decade—even without renewed funding—is more than half a million undergraduates. With continued funding, we will reach millions of students.

Curriculum Reform

By building teams of Civil Discourse Fellows on each campus, we prompt a nationwide, faculty-led movement to reform General Education Requirements to include sound-reasoning-plus-dialogue pedagogy.

Generalizable Knowledge

The project will generate data, publications, and implementation tools freely available to other institutions, contributing to generalizable knowledge through multi-institution, multilevel, longitudinal study.

ICDC promises to transform standard approaches to teaching civil discourse and dramatically improve student learning and achievement. Involving institutions from all sectors of higher education, the initiative will restore on a vast scale campus cultures where all individuals peacefully pursue the truth in the face of disagreement.

Get Involved

We are seeking partners to help bring ICDC to scale. Whether you represent a university, civic institute, or are a faculty member interested in becoming a Civil Discourse Fellow, we'd like to explore how we might work together.

Faculty Fellows

Apply to become a Civil Discourse Fellow. Attend a summer workshop, receive training in thinkARGUMENTS and Sway, and implement the program at your institution.

Institution Partners

Join our network of 125 campuses. We seek R1 universities, HBCUs, community colleges, and civic institutes committed to civil discourse reform.

Civic Institutes

Partner with us to host future workshops. We are seeking two additional Civic Institutes to join SCiLL in hosting Years 3 and 4 workshops.

Research Collaborators

Contribute to the largest longitudinal study of civil discourse education. Access our data, instruments, and findings for independent replication.

Ready to transform civil discourse education?

Contact us to learn more about partnership opportunities, the Civil Discourse Fellows program, or how to bring ICDC's integrated approach to your campus.

Contact Us
Project Director: Gary Comstock, Ph.D. — North Carolina State University
Co-PI: Paul Blaschko, Ph.D. — University of Notre Dame